
"Self-proclaimed feminists express worry for the rights of a pregnant woman to use illegal drugs.To someone who doesn't harbour an automatic suspicion of all things legislative, a demographic that certainly includes the rabid authoritarians who make up the anti-abortion movement, this might not seem like a bad thing at first blush. But let's look a little further past the immediate impact on our (already ridiculous) drug laws and the people affected by them (and the issue of *personal choice*, but that's another post for another day). It isn't a great stretch of logic to imagine the drug dealer who endangers a pregnancy by enabling drug use eventually morphing into the woman who endangers her own pregnancy by drug use, or... the doctor who endangers a pregnancy by performing an abortion.One of the most dangerous consequences of Bill C-484 is…that it muddies the water regarding the potential for prosecuting pregnant women who use drugs. Pregnant women who use drugs already face tremendous stigma and marginalization; many such women fail to access medical services in fear of having their children removed from their care.
Where to begin…
Is enabling a woman to continue her drug use, especially while in a pregnant state, really doing her a favour? Are we a backwards society for enforcing the protection of children? Is this all about the fact that a man can’t get pregnant, so he can harbor a drug addiction more easily than a woman? Is this a question of equality of the sexes?" [...]
"If anything, C-484 may mean tougher sentencing for offenders who sell drugs to pregnant women. Who wouldn’t want to see that? Other than drug dealers, that is."
Rabble has a good point, it just went Vrrrooom! right over PWPL's head.
(h/t: BBW)
|